The researchers conducted a comparison of the results from the two surveys, both of which were administered by telephone to participants who had pre-registered for the programs. A follow-up phase of the study entailed additional surveys administered a year or more following completion of a program. This study examined 69 different programs some programs pertained to a single state while others were multi-state. An Evaluation of the National Fishing in Schools Program: This evaluation entailed a web-based survey of student program participants as well as National Fishing in Schools Program instructors.
Over a two-year period, hands-on pilot hunting and fishing programs were offered in Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Participant surveys were administered before and after the programs in some cases, a third survey was administered following the hunting or fishing season.
In addition, surveys were administered to program instructors and mentors who conducted or assisted with the programs. The study included qualitative and quantitative research components to compare hunter safety courses offered by two major online providers. Specifically, the study entailed focus groups of newer and more experienced hunters in Tampa, Florida, and Richmond, Virginia, as well as an online survey of hunters who completed excerpts from the two courses.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the e-mail marketing campaign and its impact on hunting license sales. The Conservation Fund Needs Assessment: Responsive Management completed an organizational evaluation to determine the needs of partners, clients, and internal staff members.
The study entailed group meetings with internal staff members and a telephone survey of internal and external constituents. An Assessment of Morale Among U.
Surveillance is the continuous monitoring or routine data collection on various factors e. Surveillance systems have existing resources and infrastructure.
Data gathered by surveillance systems are invaluable for performance measurement and program evaluation, especially of longer term and population-based outcomes.
There are limits, however, to how useful surveillance data can be for evaluators. Also, these surveillance systems may have limited flexibility to add questions for a particular program evaluation. In the best of all worlds, surveillance and evaluation are companion processes that can be conducted simultaneously. Evaluation may supplement surveillance data by providing tailored information to answer specific questions about a program.
Data from specific questions for an evaluation are more flexible than surveillance and may allow program areas to be assessed in greater depth. Evaluators can also use qualitative methods e. Both research and program evaluation make important contributions to the body of knowledge, but fundamental differences in the purpose of research and the purpose of evaluation mean that good program evaluation need not always follow an academic research model. Research is generally thought of as requiring a controlled environment or control groups.
In field settings directed at prevention and control of a public health problem, this is seldom realistic. Of the ten concepts contrasted in the table, the last three are especially worth noting. Unlike pure academic research models, program evaluation acknowledges and incorporates differences in values and perspectives from the start, may address many questions besides attribution, and tends to produce results for varied audiences.
Program staff may be pushed to do evaluation by external mandates from funders, authorizers, or others, or they may be pulled to do evaluation by an internal need to determine how the program is performing and what can be improved. While push or pull can motivate a program to conduct good evaluations, program evaluation efforts are more likely to be sustained when staff see the results as useful information that can help them do their jobs better.
Data gathered during evaluation enable managers and staff to create the best possible programs, to learn from mistakes, to make modifications as needed, to monitor progress toward program goals, and to judge the success of the program in achieving its short-term, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Most public health programs aim to change behavior in one or more target groups and to create an environment that reinforces sustained adoption of these changes, with the intention that changes in environments and behaviors will prevent and control diseases and injuries. Through evaluation, you can track these changes and, with careful evaluation designs, assess the effectiveness and impact of a particular program, intervention, or strategy in producing these changes.
The Working Group prepared a set of conclusions and related recommendations to guide policymakers and practitioners. Program evaluation is one of ten essential public health services [8] and a critical organizational practice in public health. The underlying logic of the Evaluation Framework is that good evaluation does not merely gather accurate evidence and draw valid conclusions, but produces results that are used to make a difference.
You determine the market by focusing evaluations on questions that are most salient, relevant, and important. You ensure the best evaluation focus by understanding where the questions fit into the full landscape of your program description, and especially by ensuring that you have identified and engaged stakeholders who care about these questions and want to take action on the results.
The steps in the CDC Framework are informed by a set of standards for evaluation. The 30 standards cluster into four groups:. Utility: Who needs the evaluation results? Will the evaluation provide relevant information in a timely manner for them?
Feasibility: Are the planned evaluation activities realistic given the time, resources, and expertise at hand? Propriety: Does the evaluation protect the rights of individuals and protect the welfare of those involved? Does it engage those most directly affected by the program and changes in the program, such as participants or the surrounding community? Accuracy: Will the evaluation produce findings that are valid and reliable, given the needs of those who will use the results? Sometimes the standards broaden your exploration of choices.
Often, they help reduce the options at each step to a manageable number. Find out the areas assessed, age range of children, scoring information, and more. Seamless assessment and intervention for all young children Streamlined and enhanced with an array of user-requested updates, Assessment, Evaluation, and Programming System for Infants and Children, Third Edition, gives your early childhood program the most accurate, useful child data and a proven way to turn data into effective action across everything you do.
View In Store. You are here Home Resources Assessment and Evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation. What is it?
0コメント